![]() ![]() Harper & Bros, New Yorkįrank JN (1945) Fate and freedom. Some aspects on government in a democracy. Cornell Law Rev 17(4):568–603įrank JN (1933) Why not a clinical lawyer-school? Univ Pa Law Rev 81(8):907–923įrank JN (1942) If men were angels. Justice Holmes and non-Euclidean legal thinking. Univ Pa Law Rev 80(1):17–53įrank JN (1931b) What courts do in fact. The effect on legal thinking of the assumption that judges behave like human beings. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/London, 2009įrank JN (1931a) Are judges human? I. Univ Pa Law Rev 79:1052–1096įrank JN (1930) Law and the modern mind. Philos Rev 33(6):560–572 ĭickinson J (1931) Legal rules: their function in the process of decision. Harcourt Brace and Co., New Yorkĭewey J (1924) Logical method and the law. Univ Chic Law Rev 24(1):633–642Ĭhase A (1979) Jerome Frank and American psychoanalytic jurisprudence. Sat Law Rev Lit, March, 7Īrnold ThW (1956) Judge Jerome Frank. He narrowed his field of specialization to a number of topics in this area, showing a marked interest in aspects connected with the reconstruction of the facts in court, namely, the nature of prejudice and beliefs, the provision and reconstruction of evidence in the Trial Courts, and the role of the jury.Īckerman BA (1974) Law and the modern mind by Jerome Frank. However, it also drew on Frank’s profound knowledge of the American judicial and administrative system. This characteristic developed as a combination of the philosophical, anthropological, and psychological influences that marked his investigations in the field of law. Frank’s jurisprudence, a product of the climate of philosophical pragmatism and legal antiformalism of the early twentieth century, proposed a radical interpretation of these perspectives, shifting the accent from the rules to the judge. His vision led to the “clinical” method of law study, of which he was the first theorist. At the same time, he was committed to reforming the teaching model adopted in American Law Schools. A nonacademic scholar, Frank concentrated his enquiry on the nature of the judge’s decision-making process, underlining its authoritative character. Frank (1889–1957) was one of the founders of American legal realism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |